By Praise Necherem
A group, Andy Uba Campaign Council (AUCC) has expressed disappointment over Sahara Reporters’ certificate forgery allegation against Senator Andy Uba, the All Progressives Congress (APC), candidate for the November 6 governorship election in Anambra State.
It wondered why the online platform with such reputation could condescend to publish a false report, which it said would have been a basis for disqualifying the APC candidate from contesting primary if there was element of truth in it.
In a statement from its Director General, Paul Chukwuma, the group regretted that the report failed basic journalism rules of balance and justification, as no attempt was made to seek out Sen. Andy Uba’s comment on the said allegation.
It urged the public to disregard the publication and to be exceptionally wary of what they read, hear, see and believe on internet, particularly as the 2023 general election drew nearer.
The statement read, “Our attention has been drawn to an old report published on Sahara Reporters, an online media outlet notoriously known for publishing controversial stories, purporting a certificate forgery allegation against the good person of Distinguished Senator Andy Uba, the All Progressives Congress (APC), candidate for the November 6, Anambra governorship election.
“Ordinarily, the Andy Uba Campaign Council (AUCC), would have chosen to remain silent and not dignify authors of the rehashed fake news with a response, but we are also conscious of the fact that false and fake news are specifically targetted at the public; voting public, in this instance, the good people of Anambra, who may be decieved and hence swayed by what is an outright fabrication.
“As a responsible campaign organisation and as it is in keeping with our avowed commitment to keep the good people of Anambra abreast with needed clarifications on Andy Uba’s campaign to emerge as governor by God’s grace in November, we are forced to make the following statements to clear the air.
“Like we earlier pointed out, the report is an old one, published on 31, March 2017. Common sense should dictate that if there was any truth to the said Sahara Reporters’ publication, it would have been a basis for disqualifying our candidate at the party level from even contesting primaries.
“The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), would have been forced to raise objections, too, at some levels. But as it so happened, Sen. Andy Uba did not only scaled through the party primaries, he has been stamped with the seal of approval by INEC as the bonafide authentic candidate of his party.
“Even more, Sen. Uba is still waxing stronger and winning many more stakeholders in Anambra to his worthy course of rescuing the state from the pestilential hands of the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) and Willy Obiano.
“May we also add, like we earlier noted, that the platform on which the report was published is notoriously known for the worst form of cash and carry journalism. It’s a ‘pay-as-you-go’ kind of publishing portal where what you pay its notorious owner and rabble rouser determines what they publish on Sahara Reporters Platform.
“A detailed analysis of the said report equally bares it out as a poorly done hack job. To those who are familiar with the basic rules journalism, the report failed the basic test of balance and justification.
“What this means is that when you hear one side of an accusation, you must hear the other side from the man accused and present both in a balanced manner. No truth was established in the story on the claims made about Sen. Uba to warrant such horrid publication.
“No attempt was made by the so called online newspaper to seek out Sen. Andy Uba’s comment on the said allegation.
“As a result of the foregoing, we are forced to again sound the alarm to the general public on the need to be exceptionally wary at this time, going into 2023, of what they read, hear, see and believe on internet. We live in the internet age where all manner of stories, untrue and baseless can be digitally altered to make it real.
“Nothing, as it were, can stop a virtual recreation of fictional certificate and then sent to an exam body, asking it to authenticate such documentation. Of course, the exam body may likely reject authorship of the said certification, thereby unwittingly serving to tarnish the image of an innocent man targeted for character assassination because of an election.